View Full Version : K-1 Paris ratings, not the best...
( o Y o )
31st May 2005, 06:31 AM
But when you consider there were only 4 "names" it wasn`t bad either.
14.1% at the high and just squeeking in a double digit 10.4% average
heckyl
31st May 2005, 06:42 AM
thats unfortunate. i enjoyed this event all around. first "real" event in a while.
OneTwoThree
31st May 2005, 06:58 AM
Well... Is that surprising, considering the event was aired in Japan in the middle of the night?
CentralKickboxing.Org
31st May 2005, 07:45 AM
The K-1 has been sending mixed messages to the fans for a while now. The numbers are starting to show the textbook response. Mark my words, they'll get worse not better for a few years.
This has nothing to do with economics. It is executives making bad decisions pure and simple.
danvari
31st May 2005, 08:46 AM
thats unfortunate. i enjoyed this event all around. first "real" event in a while.
I would say that K-1 Scandinavia was a quite "real" event, but I understand your point.
zymogen
31st May 2005, 06:41 PM
Who votes in the K-1 ratings?
heckyl
31st May 2005, 10:55 PM
I would say that K-1 Scandinavia was a quite "real" event, but I understand your point.
scandinavia was also a great event.
K1power
1st June 2005, 03:22 AM
Apart from the superfights - Abidi vs LeBanner was easily the best fight of the night, also it was funny to see Kakuda knock Mavrick out with one punch - I was quite dissappointed with the event. The line-up consisted of - in my opinion - boring fighters to watch, except of course Ignashov (although he fucked up again). I don't know what it was but all the fights looked so... I don't know... dull. Fights that ended in knock-outs looked to have ended because of fatigue/lack of heart rather than serious impact. Good thing about this tournament was that it was a non-freak event.
( o Y o )
1st June 2005, 04:06 AM
Who votes in the K-1 ratings?
These are television ratings so they are assed by independant compaines.