Confusion with, or questions about the K-1 Grand Prix Prediction Competition!!

[davidk]

im confused
u wrote
1. Remy Bonjasky vs. Musashi
WINNER: Remy Bonjasky
METHOD: KO
ROUND: 2
TIME: 2:28

2a. Musashi vs Peter Aerts
WINNER: Musashi
METHOD: JD

2b. Remy Bonjasky vs Peter Graham
WINNER: Remy Bonjasky
METHOD: KO
ROUND: 1
TIME: 1:44
bonjasky beat abidi to get in the finals with musashi
so should 2b be bonjasky vs abidi or am i interpreting it wrong

in other words do we put

do we write the winner of the tournament as (1), the previous fight he won as (2b) and his opponents previous fight as (2a)

[( o Y o )]

bonjasky beat abidi to get in the finals with musashi
so should 2b be bonjasky vs abidi or am i interpreting it wrong

No, you are correct and Abidi's name has been edited in. Sorry for the confusion.



do we write the winner of the tournament as (1), the previous fight he won as (2b) and his opponents previous fight as (2a)

Exacly. Cracked_Knuckle's is in the correct format.




1. Sefo vs. Aerts
GP Winner: Sefo
Method: JD

2a. Ray Sefo vs. Might Mo
Winner: Sefo
Method: KO/TKO
ROUND: 3
TIME: 2:20

2b. Peter Aerts vs. Remy Bojansky
Winner: Aerts
Method: JD

[Titan]

NOTE: for JDs, do write RD3 or RD4 or RD5 or whatever.

Failing to do so will result in not getting 2 valuable points. Somebody that does write RD3 as opposed to somebody that writes nothing must be given the point-advantage in such a case. Same with somebody that writes RD4 only risks the points not being counted, but is still *closer* in time to the win than somebody that leaves the round empty instead of write RD3.