PDA

View Full Version : M-1 comment on attack Dana White on Fedor


M-1 Challenge
23rd October 2008, 07:51 PM
M-1 Global president Vadim Finkelstein comments another attack of UFC’s Dana White on Fedor Emelianenko.

Dana says UFC’s doors are wide open. Maybe they are. But these doors also shut tightly once
the fighter signs with the organization. Randy Couture came back to the UFC and what now?
Instead of fighting the best in the promotion he has to fight a young upstart with 2-1 prorecord.
Couture might not survive all the three contractual fights. I’m afraid that’s being
made in order to finish the star which is Randy and not let him fight Fedor.
I said it many times – we are ready to make this clash happen in any shape of joint event.
This bout is the most anticipated event in the world of MMA. But Fedor will not sign to the
enslaving terms of the UFC contract while UFC won’t agree to make compromise.
Why would Fedor need to prove anything to anybody? He’s already defeated 4 ex-UFC
champions and twice UFC Interim champion in Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira.
According to White there are guys better than Tim Sylvia. Well, who are they? Looking at the
world rankings one can conclude it is Fedor himself, Couture whose situation I discussed
above, then it’s Nogueira, Josh Barnett and Andrei Arlovski. To face off with Josh or Andrei
there is no need for Fedor to come to UFC. He’ll fight them at Affliction.
I truly believe Dana White did more for MMA than anybody else, but at the moment he is
the one who hinders the sport’s progress. He seems like a man with a big tasty pie who’s
afraid that someone comes and bites a piece of it.
All we want is mutually beneficial cooperation but the old conditions offered by UFC are
simply unacceptable.

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/9849/hoofdfotovadimfinkelstevq2.jpg

Jarzi
23rd October 2008, 08:08 PM
Fedor looks like an old drunk in that picture :)

Souder
23rd October 2008, 10:35 PM
I think they way he is staring he spotted a bottle of Vodka in the crowd.

ilostmydog
23rd October 2008, 10:48 PM
Couture might not survive all three contracted fights because he is fighting young upstarts rather than the best in the promotion?

unicorn
24th October 2008, 02:57 AM
I think with this they imply that UFC is trying to wash down Couture instead of keeping him at class level.

loreia
24th October 2008, 07:02 AM
LOL at the picture...

I think this response was unnecessary. Nothing new here, he is just repeating the same old story. Dana wants an exclusive contract, and Vadim/Fjodor would not sign an exclusive contract.

They should either compromise or just give up. Much more interesting news would be the news about Fjodor's next fight.

FieldingMellish
24th October 2008, 12:45 PM
"Couture might not survive the three fights"???

If the man can't compete, and presumably even live through, fighting "youg upstarts" and other people who aren't the best heavyweights, then why does he 'deserve' to Fight Fedor in the first place?

gols
24th October 2008, 02:07 PM
Maybe he means that Randy might retire or be injured before he completes 3 fights.

FieldingMellish
24th October 2008, 02:20 PM
LOL at the picture...

I think this response was unnecessary. Nothing new here, he is just repeating the same old story. Dana wants an exclusive contract, and Vadim/Fjodor would not sign an exclusive contract.

They should either compromise or just give up. Much more interesting news would be the news about Fjodor's next fight.

According to the Affliction website - its Arlovski on January 24th 2009.

loreia
24th October 2008, 02:27 PM
^
Thanks, I didn't know that fight was still on.

ilostmydog
24th October 2008, 03:44 PM
^
Thanks, I didn't know that fight was still on.

I think you are in the same boat as t-shirt guy. He said the fight was on, then two days later he said AA and Barnett were both possible opponents for Fedor, and now the AA fight is apparently back on again.

Chewbaca Joe
24th October 2008, 04:53 PM
Maybe he means that Randy might retire or be injured before he completes 3 fights.

To assume that would reek of level headedness and impartiality. Can't have that on the internet my friend.